

The 60/40 portfolio lost 16% in 2022 and was declared dead. Then it came back. How it works and whether it still makes sense.

Asset allocation is the single biggest driver of your investment returns. Learn how to split your portfolio across stocks, bonds, and cash based on your goals.

Not sure how to invest money? This guide shows exactly where to put your first $100, $1,000, or $10,000 based on your goals and timeline.

Founder of Arcanomy
Ph.D. engineer and MBA writing about wealth psychology, financial clarity, and why most money advice misses the point.
Subscribe for more insights, tips, and updates, straight to your inbox.
We respect your privacy and will never share your information.
In January 2020, a couple in their mid-50s had a tidy $400,000 portfolio, split evenly between stocks and bonds. Then the pandemic hit. Then came the recovery. Then came the inflation spike. By the end of 2023, without a single trade, their portfolio had quietly drifted to 68% stocks and 32% bonds. Their "balanced" retirement plan was now taking nearly twice the risk they'd agreed to.
They didn't notice until a routine check-in. Nobody ever does.
30-Second Summary: Portfolio rebalancing means adjusting your investments back to your target mix when markets push them off course. You can do it on a schedule, when drift exceeds a threshold, or by directing new contributions. The best strategy is the one you'll actually follow.
Rebalancing is the process of selling investments that have grown beyond their target weight and buying those that have fallen below it, restoring your original asset allocation [1].
The concept is straightforward. Markets move. When stocks surge and bonds lag, your portfolio silently becomes riskier. When bonds outperform, it becomes more conservative. Neither shift reflects a decision you made. It's drift, and it works against you in both directions.
A hypothetical 60/40 portfolio created in 2004 that was never rebalanced would have drifted to 81% stocks and 19% bonds by the end of 2023 [2]. That investor would have entered the next downturn with nearly twice the stock exposure they originally chose.
Rebalancing isn't about maximizing returns. It's about risk control. You're enforcing the allocation that matches your goals, timeline, and sleep quality.
Pick a date (or two) per year. Check your allocation. If it's drifted from your target, trade back to it. Done.
This is the simplest approach and works well for most people. Vanguard's research shows no meaningful performance difference between monthly, quarterly, or annual rebalancing [1]. More frequent trades just increase costs without improving outcomes.
Annual rebalancing is the sweet spot for most investors. Some prefer semi-annual (January and July). Few need anything more frequent.
Best for: People who want a simple system they won't overthink.
Instead of checking the calendar, you set a trigger. When any asset class drifts 5% (or whatever band you choose) from its target, you rebalance.
A 60% stock target with a 5% band means you'd act when stocks hit 65% or drop to 55%. This approach responds to market moves rather than arbitrary dates.
The trade-off: you need to monitor. If you don't check regularly, the threshold doesn't matter. Some brokerages offer automatic alerts when your allocation drifts beyond set limits, which solves the monitoring problem.
Best for: People with larger portfolios or strong feelings about drift.
This is the sneaky-efficient approach. Instead of selling winners, you direct new money into underweight assets.
Contributing $500 a month to your 401(k)? If bonds are underweight, funnel contributions there until the allocation corrects itself. No selling. No taxes. No transaction costs.
The catch? It only works in the accumulation phase when you're adding money regularly. And it's slow. In a sharp market move, contributions alone won't keep up with drift.
Best for: Younger investors still building their portfolio. Also excellent in taxable accounts where selling creates tax events.
Priya is 45, earns $92,000, and started the year with a $110,000 portfolio targeting 60% stocks and 40% bonds.
Stocks surged 20%. Bonds dropped 5%. Here's what happened:
| Asset | Start | After Market Moves | Current % | Target % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stocks | $66,000 | $79,200 | 65.5% | 60% |
| Bonds | $44,000 | $41,800 | 34.5% | 40% |
| Total | $110,000 | $121,000 | 100% | 100% |
The drift exceeds 5%, triggering a rebalance.
New targets on the $121,000 total:
The trades:
Yes, this means selling something that just went up 20% and buying something that just went down 5%. It feels wrong. That's exactly why it works. You're enforcing "buy low, sell high" at a portfolio level, taking emotion out of the equation.
Here's the part nobody talks about: rebalancing sometimes means buying the thing everyone's panicking about. In March 2020, rebalancing meant selling bonds to buy stocks at the bottom. Uncomfortable? Enormously. Profitable? Extremely.
The tax implications of rebalancing differ wildly depending on the account.
Tax-advantaged accounts (401(k), IRA, Roth IRA): Rebalance freely. No tax consequences for buying or selling inside these accounts. This should always be your first choice for rebalancing trades [3].
Taxable brokerage accounts: Every sale is a potential taxable event. If the $6,600 in stocks Priya sold had a $5,000 cost basis, she'd owe taxes on $1,600 in gains. At the 15% long-term capital gains rate, that's a $240 tax bill [4].
The annual tax drag from poorly managed rebalancing in taxable accounts averages 1.76% per year, according to Russell Investments [2]. That's real money compounding against you.
The smart order:
Tax-loss harvesting is a whole skill unto itself. If you're holding positions that have declined, selling them to rebalance can actually generate a tax benefit. You realize the loss (deducting up to $3,000 per year against ordinary income) while simultaneously moving your allocation where it needs to go. It's not free money, but it's close.
Here's something the standard rebalancing advice glosses over. Research from the CFA Institute found that predictable rebalancing by large funds creates a hidden cost of about 8 basis points (0.08%) annually because high-frequency traders front-run the expected trades [5]. For individual investors, this number is smaller, but the principle matters: when your rebalancing is completely predictable, you can get slightly worse prices.
The fix is simple. Don't rebalance on the exact same date every year. Don't announce your schedule to anyone (not that you would). And consider the hybrid approach: set a date range ("sometime in the first two weeks of January") combined with threshold triggers. This introduces enough variability to prevent the pattern from being exploitable.
For most people with portfolios under $500k, this cost is negligible. But if you're managing seven figures, the difference between rebalancing on December 31 like every institutional fund and rebalancing on a random Tuesday in January adds up.
The research is clear: rebalancing more than once or twice a year rarely helps and often hurts [1].
Monthly rebalancing increases transaction costs by 2x to 3x compared to annual rebalancing, with virtually no improvement in risk-adjusted returns. You're paying more to achieve the same result.
The exception is during extreme market events. If a single asset class moves 15% or more in a month, checking your allocation makes sense regardless of your schedule. The COVID crash in March 2020 and the simultaneous stock-bond selloff in 2022 were both moments where an off-schedule check would have been warranted.
But "the market dropped 3% this week" is not a reason to rebalance. Markets fluctuate. That's the feature, not the bug.
You don't have to do this manually.
Target-date funds rebalance themselves. If you're in a Vanguard Target Retirement 2050 fund, the fund manager handles all of this. The trade-off is less control over your specific allocation, but for many people (especially those in employer 401(k) plans) this is the right answer. Read more about how target-date funds work.
Robo-advisors like Betterment and Wealthfront offer automatic rebalancing with tax-loss harvesting in taxable accounts. They monitor drift daily and execute small trades to keep allocations on target. If you want zero-effort rebalancing and are comfortable with the 0.25% annual fee, this is a legitimate option.
Brokerage auto-rebalance features. Some platforms (Fidelity, M1 Finance) let you set target allocations and automatically rebalance new contributions. This is the cash flow method on autopilot.
DIY with a calendar reminder. If you prefer control, set a reminder on your phone for January (and optionally July). Open your accounts, check the allocation, execute any needed trades. Total time: 30 minutes per year. That's less time than you spend picking a restaurant on a Friday night.